I help organizations understand how their work is functioning, define how it should function, and—when needed—support implementation of needed changes. I also provide standalone program and project management for active initiatives.
RPM services are designed around three clear offerings: assessment and structure design, implementation support as a follow-on engagement, and standalone program and project management for work already underway.
Assessment & Structure Design clarifies what needs to change. Implementation helps put those recommendations into practice. Program & Project Management is available as a separate service when you need focused execution support for a defined initiative.
Assess current-state operations to identify gaps, inefficiencies, pain points, and opportunities for improvement—then design a clearer structure for how work should function.
Operational Structure Assessment & Process Mapping
Assessed administrative workflows and operating structure for a growing graduate program, with a focus on current-state responsibilities, gaps, duplications, and clearer systems for future growth.
Support implementation of needed changes by driving alignment, coordinating across teams, and helping ensure the new structure is adopted in practice.
This service is offered as a follow-on to Operational Assessment & Structure Design.
Provide standalone program and project management for active initiatives that need structure, coordination, execution tracking, and accountability.
Project Management — Technology Risk & PRCI Uplift
Partnered with technology risk leadership to bring structure, visibility, and operating rhythm to complex risk and control work across stakeholders and high-priority workstreams.
Engagements are scoped collaboratively to ensure the right level of depth and impact. Assessment & Structure Design engagements are typically scoped as fixed-fee projects. Implementation work may follow once recommendations are defined. Program & Project Management engagements are scoped separately based on the timeline, complexity, and level of weekly involvement required.
Best for organizations that need clarity on how work is currently functioning and what should change.
Payment is typically divided across the engagement timeline, commonly at signing, midway through the timeline, and upon completion.
Best for follow-on implementation of approved changes or standalone support for active initiatives.
Designed for consistent progress, alignment, and accountability.
Clarify goals, stakeholders, scope, and current pain points.
Review structures, workflows, roles, and decision points.
Build practical recommendations, operating models, and plans.
Translate findings into proposed changes, expected impact, and next steps.